Rabu, 02 Oktober 2019

Why bank ATM fees are now higher than ever (And what it could cost you) - Fox Business

If you often grab cash from the closest ATM while you are out and about without paying attention to the fine print of the out-of-network ATM withdrawal fee— now is a great time to start.

Continue Reading Below

Hopefully you are one of the more and more Americans who have stopped wasting money on these out-of-network fees, which is the price you pay to take your money out of an ATM that doesn’t belong to your bank. But if you are not, you should know that by remaining in the club you are now paying more than ever to get your hands on your own money.

The cost of the average out-of-network ATM withdrawal has reached a new record high of $4.72, according to the latest Bankrate.com Checking Account and ATM Fee Study released on Wednesday. This all-in fee, which includes the ATM surcharge – the fee that ATM owners charge non-customers – as well as the penalty that banks charge their own customers to make out-of-network withdrawals, is up 33 percent over the last decade.

“Paying $5 in fees to get $50 out of the ATM, is giving up 10% of your money,” Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate.com, told FOX Business. “You could borrow a lot cheaper than 10 percent, so paying 10 percent to get at your own money is needless when the fees could be so easily avoided by planning ahead.”

Why fees keep going up

McBride says one bright spot to the research is the fact that over the years fewer and fewer Americans are making out-of-network ATM withdrawals, but because of this the fees continue to rise to make up for the difference.

"People are making fewer ATM withdrawals -- and being smarter about it when they do, so the number of people being impacted is on the decline. Unfortunately that means that those that are still making out-of-network ATM withdrawals, they are paying higher fees," says McBride.

 "Throwing money away"

Sloppy financial habits will put you in the poor house.

- Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate.com

McBride says paying ATM fees a few times a month won’t likely leave you broke in the short term, but it can signal bigger financial problems.

"That sloppiness is potentially symptomatic of other financial issues. In other words, paying $5 for an out out-of-network ATM fee once or twice a month by itself is not going to put you in the poor house. But, sloppy financial habits will put you in the poor house," McBride says.

Another type of fee on the rise, the cost of overdrawing a checking account increased for the 19th time in 21 years. The current average cost for non-sufficient funds (NSF) sits at $33.36, just shy of the record of $33.38 set in 2017.

“The small dollars add up to bigger dollars when you look at the various ways you may be throwing money away,” McBride added.

ATM fees vary by region

Houston has the highest average out-of-network ATM fee of the 25 major metro areas examined in the study ($5.58), while Los Angeles has the lowest ($4.15).

*Reflects both ATM fees combined (those charged by the out-of-network ATM operator and those charged by the consumer's own financial institution)

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

 More findings from Bankrate's 2019 study

  • The fee assessed by the ATM owner on a non-customer increased to a new record of $3.09, while the fee charged by the account holder's own bank for using another institution’s ATM decreased slightly to $1.63.
  • The current average overdraft fee sits at $33.36, just shy of the record of $33.38 set in 2017.
  • Houston has the highest average out-of-network ATM fee of the 25 major metro areas examined ($5.58), while Los Angeles has the lowest ($4.15). Philadelphia has the highest average overdraft fee ($35.50) and Cincinnati has the lowest ($30.95).
  • 99 percent of non-interest checking accounts are either free by default or can become free, however less than half (42 percent) are free without stipulation.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxbusiness.com/money/bank-atm-fees-record-high

2019-10-02 08:16:15Z
52780399241812

In Opioid Settlement, Johnson & Johnson Agrees To Pay Ohio Counties $20 Million - NPR

Akron fire medic Paul Drouhard shows a box containing Naloxone Hydrochloride, a drug carried in all their department emergency response vehicles to treat opioid overdose patients. Keith Srakocic/AP hide caption

toggle caption
Keith Srakocic/AP

Johnson & Johnson and two Ohio counties have reached a tentative $20.4 million settlement that removes the corporation from the first federal lawsuit against opioid manufacturers, scheduled to begin later this month.

In a statement released Tuesday, the healthcare giant said the agreement with Cleveland's Cuyahoga and Akron's Summit counties allows it "to avoid the resource demands and uncertainty of a trial." However, the terms stipulate that Johnson & Johnson makes "no admission of liability."

"[The] Company is open to identifying an appropriate, comprehensive resolution of the overall opioid litigation. At the same time, the Company remains prepared to defend its actions," the statement said.

In a deal which must be approved by a federal judge, Johnson & Johnson agreed to pay the counties a total of $10 million and to reimburse them for $5 million in legal fees. An additional $5.4 million would go toward programs to fight opioid addiction in the two counties.

In 2017, Ohio had the nation's second highest per capita rate of fatal opioid overdoses, with 46.3 deaths per 100,000 people, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. West Virginia had the highest rate at 57.8 per 100,000, the CDC said.

Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, made two opioids that were distributed in Cuyahoga and Summit counties. Johnson & Johnson says the drugs were "responsibly marketed" and "accounted for less than one percent of the total opioid prescriptions in the United States."

In August, the drug maker was ordered to pay $572 million in a case in Oklahoma, which blamed Johnson & Johnson for helping fuel the opioid crisis in the state. The company has appealed the ruling.

Judge Thad Balkman, who presided over the Oklahoma case, said the pharmaceutical giant "caused an opioid crisis that is evidenced by increased rates of addiction, overdose deaths and neonatal abstinence syndrome" in the state.

The case involving the Ohio counties is the first federal case to be brought against pharmaceutical companies and is therefore seen as potentially setting precedent for how similar suits will be handled.

Four other drug makers have already settled ahead of the Oct. 21 trial, but McKesson Corp., AmerisourceBergen, Cardinal Health, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Henry Schein Inc. are still listed as defendants, according to Reuters.

The maker of OxyContin, Purdue Pharma, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy last month, has reached a tentative settlement in the Ohio suit worth some $12 billion.

Johnson & Johnson, like the other drug makers, still faces some 2,000 other suits in various states related to the opioid epidemic.

Early next year, a similar case brought by West Virginia's Cabell County and the city of Huntington — which have the highest opioid overdose rates in the country — is set to be taken up.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.npr.org/2019/10/02/766332253/in-opioid-settlement-johnson-johnson-agrees-to-pay-ohio-counties-20-million

2019-10-02 09:41:00Z
52780399115775

Johnson & Johnson reaches settlement with Ohio over opioid crisis - BBC News

Johnson & Johnson has agreed to a $20.4m (£16.6m) settlement with two counties in the US state of Ohio.

The healthcare giant said it was made to avoid a trial on allegations of fuelling opioid addiction in the state.

Johnson & Johnson said in a statement that the deal was not an admission of liability for the state's epidemic.

It is the fourth drugmaker to settle claims in Ohio amid more than 2,600 lawsuits by state and local governments against painkiller manufacturers.

Tuesday's announcement comes after a landmark ruling in August which ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $572m (£468m) for its part in fuelling Oklahoma's opioid addiction crisis.

In a statement, Johnson & Johnson said it would pay $10m to Cuyahoga and Summit counties, and another $5m to cover their legal expenses.

Another $5.4m will be given to charities involved with opioid-related programs in the counties.

What is the opioid crisis?

Opioids are a group of drugs that range from codeine, to illegal drugs like heroin.

Prescription opioids are primarily used for pain relief. They can be highly addictive.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

On average, 130 Americans die from an opioid overdose every day, according to the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Opioids were involved in almost 400,000 overdose deaths in the US from 1999 to 2017, according to its research.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49903806

2019-10-02 07:06:50Z
52780399115775

Selasa, 01 Oktober 2019

Ford expects to book Q3 impairment charges of up to $900 million on India fixed assets - MarketWatch

Ford Motor Co. F, +0.88% said Tuesday it expects to book an impairment charge of $800 million to $900 million related to fixed assets in its India Automotive operations. The charge is required based on held-for-sale impairment testing conducted in connection with the pending sale of assets to a joint venture in India that Ford is creating with Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 500520, +1.71%, the company said in a regulatory filing. The charge will not result in cash expenditures, said the filing. Ford said it still expects about $11 billion in potential EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) charges for a global overhaul of its operations, with a negative cash effect of about $7 billion. Shares were not active premarket, but have gained 19.7% in 2019, while the S&P 500 SPX, +0.50% has gained 18.7%.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.marketwatch.com/story/ford-expects-to-book-q3-impairment-charges-of-up-to-900-million-on-india-fixed-assets-2019-10-01

2019-10-01 11:25:00Z
52780398609546

Credit Suisse COO Resigns Over Surveillance Scandal - The Wall Street Journal

Credit Suisse Group AG Chief Operating Officer Pierre-Olivier BouĂ©e resigned after an internal probe found he ordered the surveillance of the bank’s former wealth-management chief by private investigators without discussing it with Chief Executive Tidjane Thiam or other senior bank officials.

His decision set off a scandal that has enveloped the bank for the past two weeks, triggering an internal investigation at Credit Suisse and dealing Mr. Thiam one of the more unusual challenges he has faced at the bank.

...

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.wsj.com/articles/credit-suisse-coo-resigns-over-surveillance-scandal-11569908569

2019-10-01 05:42:00Z
52780396584842

Credit Suisse clears CEO in spying probe, COO Bouee to go - CNBC

A Swiss flag flies over a sign of Swiss bank Credit Suisse on May 8, 2014 in Bern.

FABRICE COFFRINI | AFP | Getty Images

Credit Suisse on Tuesday cleared Chief Executive Tidjane Thiam in an internal investigation into the botched surveillance of the bank's former wealth management head Iqbal Khan in a probe that cost Thiam's right-hand man his job.

Chief Operating Officer Pierre-Olivier Bouee resigned after the investigation by the Homburger law firm found he alone initiated observation of Khan, who abruptly left in July and later joined arch-rival UBS.

"The Board of Directors considers that the mandate for the observation of Iqbal Khan was wrong and disproportionate and has resulted in severe reputational damage to the bank," Switzerland's second-biggest bank said in a statement.

"The Homburger investigation did not identify any indication that the CEO had approved the observation of Iqbal Khan nor that he was aware of it prior to September 18, 2019, after the observation had been aborted," the bank said.

Two big shareholders had said they wanted Tidjane, architect of a sweeping three-year revamp at the bank he joined in 2015, to stay unless it was shown he broke the law.

Credit Suisse launched the enquiry to find out the circumstances that led to a confrontation in Zurich on Sept. 17 between Khan and private detectives that Credit Suisse had hired to tail him. 

"Neither the Homburger investigation nor the observation of Iqbal Khan identified any evidence that Iqbal Khan had attempted to poach employees or clients away from Credit Suisse, contrary to his contractual obligations," it said.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/01/credit-suisse-clears-ceo-in-spying-probe-coo-bouee-to-go.html

2019-10-01 05:34:11Z
52780396584842

Mega mall owners mull investing in Forever 21 after bankruptcy - Fox Business

Two mall titans may invest in the bankrupt teen retailer Forever 21.

Continue Reading Below

The retailer filed for bankruptcy protection on Sunday morning and recently tried to cut a deal in which its two largest landlords, Brookfield Property and Simon Property, would take an ownership stake, according to the New York Post.

The reason, is Forever 21 uses a lot of mall space with its 541 stores. The nationwide closure of 178 locations would leave big holes at shopping malls.

Negotiations between the retailer, Brookfield, and Simon are considered dead for now as they reached an impasse over the weekend.

Reps for Simon, Brookfield and Forever 21 didn’t respond to requests for comment by The Post.

Forever 21 is planning to close 350 of its 800 stores worldwide, including most of its operations in Asia and Europe, according to court documents.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

Three years ago, Simon and mall operators GGP,  which is now owned by Simon, rescued teen chain Aeropostale out of bankruptcy rather than face 740 stores going dark.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxbusiness.com/retail/mega-mall-owners-mull-investing-in-forever-21-after-bankruptcy

2019-10-01 05:32:27Z
52780397317380